<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>REIT Wrecks &#187; Office REITs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/category/office-reits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com</link>
	<description>High Yield REITs And Commercial Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 02:18:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.30</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Piedmont Office REIT Finally Goes Public&#8230;Sort Of</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/02/piedmont-office-reit-finally-goes.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/02/piedmont-office-reit-finally-goes.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Traded REIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Traded REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REIT News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Swenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piedmont Office REIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells REIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Non-Traded REITs are a funny lot. They register with the SEC and comply with all public company filing requirements, yet their shares don&#8217;t trade on any public exchange. Most aspire publicly to achieve some sort of &#8220;liquidity event&#8221; for investors within 7-10 years of formation, either through a public listing or bulk asset sales. Last [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=2"><span class="drop_cap">N</span>on-Traded REITs</a> are a funny lot.  They register with the SEC and comply with all public company filing requirements, yet their shares don&#8217;t trade on any public exchange.  Most aspire publicly to achieve some sort of &#8220;liquidity event&#8221; for investors within 7-10 years of formation, either through a public listing or bulk asset sales.  Last week, after more than 2 decades, numerous lawsuits and a complicated 3 for 1 reverse split that effectively locks up shareholders for another 12 months, one of the largest Non-Traded REITs in the business finally made the leap to a public listing.</p>
<p><p>
Formerly known as Wells REIT until it was spun out into a new, self-managed entity and renamed in 2007,  Piedmont (<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><span id="ticker">PDM</span></span>) sold 12 million shares at $14.50 and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the morning of February 10th.  The Company had planned to offer 18 million shares at a price of $16-$18.</p>
<p>Piedmont, which owns and manages a 73 property, $4 billion portfolio of office buildings across the country, including trophy properties like the Aon Center in downtown Chicago and the Nestle headquarters in Los Angeles, has a colorful history.</p>
<p>The company was founded in 1997 by Leo Wells and quickly became adept at raising money through a network of independent brokers, paying them commissions of 7% along the way.  Wells also earned lucrative acquisition fees for buying property, as well as advisory fees for managing the portfolio.  Allegedly, Wells also encouraged investor participation in prayer chains for favorable acquisitions.</p>
<p>This unconventional model attracted the attention of many skeptics, including David Swensen, Yale Endowment&#8217;s chief investment officer.  Swensen accused Wells of turning a blind eye toward investors&#8217; best interests while he raced to raise money and buy more property.  In his book &#8220;Unconventional Success&#8221; (pages 70-75), Swenson said the high fees simply encouraged two things: the sale of still more shares and the purchase of property &#8211; any property &#8211; at almost any price:</p>
<p><em>No rational buyer can compete with the Wells acquisition machine&#8217;s willingness to overpay for product. As a consequence, investors suffer the double indignity of high fees and poor investment prospects.</em></p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Piedmont IPO is confirming Swensen&#8217;s claims.  Prior to the public listing, Wells orchestrated a 3 for 1 reverse stock split that created four separate classes of shares.  Only one class, the Class A shares, now trade on the NYSE, while the rest will convert over time.  This effectively delays a full &#8220;liquidity event&#8221; for another 12 months.  The Class A shares traded up to $16 on Friday, but that still translates into a pre-split loss of almost 40%, according to Green Street Advisors.</p>
<p>Even the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704194504575031570991760014.html">pilloried the IPO</a>.  The Journal estimated that investors would have received a &#8220;paltry&#8221; 2.1% annual return including dividends, assuming the offering priced at the high end of the $18 range.  According to an analysis by Green Street Advisors, had those investors simply bought shares in an index of publicly traded real-estate stocks, their total return over that time would have averaged about 8% a year.</p>
<p>Ironically, shareholders had the option of being cashed out in 2007 through a series of buyout offers from Lexington Realty Trust (<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><span id="ticker">LXP</span></span>).  Lexington offered to pay up to $9.25 per share (a post-split equivalent of more than $18 per share), but Wells never informed investors of the offers.</p>
<p>Sir Leo argued that the Lexington buyout offers were not material because they were merely tentative expressions of interest.  Unfortunately, a federal district court disagreed, stating that &#8220;there can be no doubt that this information is material, as it would be considered important by a reasonable shareholder in deciding whether to vote for or against the [spin off].&#8221;  The court also granted the plaintiff&#8217;s request for a class action, and discovery continues.</p>
<p>However, not only did Wells not inform shareholders of the LXP offer, he took the bulk of a $175 million stock payout as a result of the spin off to Piedmont.  And when it came time to actually issue himself the stock grant, he lowered the official share price to $8.63, below the $9.25 per share offered by LXP, in order to increase the size of his award.</p>
<p>Certainly, public REITs are imperfect vehicles for a variety of reasons.  They are highly correlated to equities, they can be much more volatile than the underlying real estate in which they invest, and they are not great as <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/07/reits-real-estate-inflation-hedging.html">inflation hedges</a> either.  However, beginning at 9:30 every Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, investors in public REITs can vote with their feet and reclaim their money.  Sadly, long-suffering Wells shareholders are stuck sucking swamp water for another 12 months before they finally get that freedom.  (Update: here&#8217;s some information on <strong><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&#038;t=13">how to sell non-traded REITs</strong></a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/02/piedmont-office-reit-finally-goes.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office REIT Directory</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/01/office-reit-list.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/01/office-reit-list.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REIT Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the most comprehensive and up to date Office REIT directory on the web; prices and yields are updated daily at the close. The list is organized by alphabet in ascending order. The list contains working links to the home page of each REIT, and links to Yahoo news. Links to additional REIT lists [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify"><span class="drop_cap">T</span>his is the most comprehensive and up to date Office REIT directory on the web; prices and yields are updated daily at the close. The list is organized by alphabet in ascending order. The list contains working links to the home page of each REIT, and links to Yahoo news. Links to additional REIT lists by property type can be found below the table.</p>
<p><p>
<span style="font-family:arial;"><center><br />
<table border="8" width="98%">
<tbody id="XigniteData">
<tr align="middle">
<th colspan="5">
<h3>OFFICE REIT LIST</h3>
<p><span style="font-size:85%;"><em>Prices &amp; Yields Updated Daily at the Close  </em></span><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></p>
</p>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>REIT Name</th>
<th>Last Price</th>
<th>Change</th>
<th>Yield</th>
<th>News</th>
</tr>
<tr id="ARE" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.labspace.com/terms.asp">Alexandria Real Estate Equities</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=ARE">ARE</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="BMR" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.biomedrealty.com/terms.asp">Biomed Realty Trust</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=BMR">BMR</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="BDN" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.brandywinerealty.com/">Brandywine Realty Trust</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=BDN">BDN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="BXP" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.bostonproperties.com/">Boston Properties</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=BXP">BXP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="OFC" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.copt.com/">Corporate Office Properties Trust</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=OFC">OFC</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="FSP" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.franklinstreetproperties.com/">Franklin Street Properties</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=FSP">FSP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="GOV" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://govreit.com/">Govenment Properties Income Trust</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=GOV">GOV</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="HRP" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.hrpreit.com/">HRPT Properties Trust</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=HRP">HRP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="HPP" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.hudsonpacificproperties.com/">Hudson Pacific Properties</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=HPP">HPP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="CLI" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.mack-cali.com/">Mack-Cali Realty Corp</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CLI">CLI</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="MPG" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.maguireproperties.com/">Maguire Properties</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=MPG">MPG</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="MSW" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.missionwest.com/">Mission West Properties Trust</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=MSW">MSW</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="PCE" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.pacificofficeproperties.com/">Pacific Office Properties</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=PCE">PCE</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="PKY" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.pky.com/">Parkway Properties</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=PKY">PKY</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="PDM" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.blogger.com/www.piedmontreit.com/">Piedmont Office REIT</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=PDM">PDM</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="PSB" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.psbusinessparks.com/">PS Business Parks</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=PSB">PSB</a></td>
</tr>
<tr id="SLG" align="middle">
<td><a href="http://www.slgreen.com/">SL Green Realty Corp</a></td>
<td class="last" style="text-align: center;">$5.25</td>
<td class="change" style="color: rgb(51, 204, 0); text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"><strong>+0.21</strong></td>
<td class="yield" style="text-align: center;">13.00%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=SLG">SLG</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></center></span><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<p>See also <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/reit-definition.html">REIT Definition</a>.  Scroll down for more REIT and real estate related news, resources and links.</p>
<p>Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/apartment-reit-list.html">list of Apartment REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/healthcare-reit-list.html">list of Healthcare REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/hotel-reit-list.html">list of Hotel REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/industrial-reit-list.html">list of Industrial REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/mortgage-reit-list.html">list of Mortgage REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/03/non-traded-reit-list.html">list of Non-Traded REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/retail-reit-list.html">list of Retail REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/storage-reit-list.html">list of Storage REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/alphabetical-list-of-all-reits-with.html">list of all REITs</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/02/reits-paying-dividends-in-stock.html">list of REITs paying dividends in stock</a><br />Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/01/reit-etf-list.html">REIT ETF list</a><br />Click here for a list of <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/04/reits-funds-list.html">REIT Funds</a></p>
<p>Information on how REITs work can be found in the post <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/reit-definition.html">REIT Definition</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img title="REIT list" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT list" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">office reits</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit">reit</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/01/office-reit-list.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Commercial Real Estate: Sternlicht and Zuckerman Have a Few Things to Say</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/01/state-of-commercial-real-estate.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/01/state-of-commercial-real-estate.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STWD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barry Sternlight and Mort Zuckerman are in the thick of it. Both run REITs that focus on two of the most battered sectors in the business: mortgages and office buildings. Sternlicht, a commercial real estate veteran, took Mortgage REIT Starwood Properties Trust (STWD), public in August, while 72 year old Zuckerman has been running Boston [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">B</span>arry Sternlight and Mort Zuckerman are in the thick of it.  Both run REITs that focus on two of the most battered sectors in the business: mortgages and office buildings.  Sternlicht, a commercial real estate veteran, took <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/mortgage-reit-list.html">Mortgage REIT</a> Starwood Properties Trust (<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><span id="ticker">STWD</span></span>), public in August, while 72 year old Zuckerman has been running Boston Properties (<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><span id="ticker">BXP</span></span>), an <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/office-reit-list.html">Office REIT</a>, for forty years.</p>
<p><p>
Boston Properties has 143 office properties concentrated in cities hard hit by the financial meltdown (Boston, New York and San Francisco) and one city not so hard hit (Washington D.C.), while Starwood has deployed almost $450 million in cash to buy loans and distressed CMBS since going public.</p>
<p><p>
In these two separate videos, Zuckerman and Sternlicht talk about the current market, property valuations, the economy, and where we go from here.  In this interview on January 8, 2010 (click &#8220;continue&#8221; after the ad&#8221;) Zuckerman, says the major markets may have bottomed:</p>
<p><p>
<center><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="cs_player" height="330" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=1242297&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=1242297&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="330" width="425"></embed></object></center></p>
<p><p>
Sternlicht, in a less sanguine Bloomberg TV interview one month earlier (December 9, 2009), is not so sure about a bottom.  For what it&#8217;s worth, I agree with his primary point: the government&#8217;s policy measures with respect to the bank owned commercial loan portfolios has had a huge dampening effect on transaction volume &#8211; and therefore price discovery.  Many investors are still not sure what these assets are worth.  As Sternlicht points out, not all banks are able to hold on, and some owners are also being forced to sell, but the only real game in town when it comes to distressed assets is still <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/05/why-fdic-loan-sales-giveaways-arent.html">FDIC loan sales</a></p>
<p><p>
<center><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="cs_player" height="330" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=1209221&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/3/&amp;wpid=0&amp;page_count=5&amp;windows=1&amp;va_id=1209221&amp;show_title=0&amp;auto_start=0&amp;auto_next=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="330" width="425"></embed></object><input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
<div id="refHTML"></center></p>
<p><p>
Whether you refer to this reticence among bankers as &#8220;extend and pretend&#8221; or &#8220;delay and pray&#8221;, there is no question that the lack of selling is delaying the necessary catharsis in commercial real estate.  REITs managed to recapitalize last year with billions <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/06/9-reits-that-had-to-be-destroyed-in.html">massively dilutive equity offerings</a>, but without new investments they will remain just that.  Instead of delay and pray, we&#8217;ll all be better off when the government tells the banks to just &#8220;confess that we made a mess&#8221;.  Enjoy the vids!  <a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/features/archives/krr-dangers-lurk-in-real-estate-trusts.html">Chris Germain San Francisco</a></p>
<p><p>
href=&#8221;http://www.reitwrecks.com/&#8221;><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; display: block;" title="Best REITs" alt="Best REITs" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><p>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits+investing" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits+investing">reits investing</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">office reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mortgage+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/mortgage+reits">mortgage reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2010/01/state-of-commercial-real-estate.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP Morgan Likes Brandywine (BDN) and Entertainment Properties Trust (EPT)</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/07/jp-morgan-likes-reit-brandywine-bdn-and.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/07/jp-morgan-likes-reit-brandywine-bdn-and.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotel reits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REIT Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JP Morgan analyst Anthony Paolone is understandably not bullish on commercial real estate fundamentals, but since the public market is typically ahead of the private market in terms of valuations, he does like certain REITs. Brandwine in particular has both refinanced existing debt, and repurchased its own debt on the open market (for a quick [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify">JP Morgan analyst Anthony Paolone is understandably not bullish on commercial real estate fundamentals, but since the public market is typically ahead of the private market in terms of valuations, he does like certain REITs.</p>
<p>Brandwine in particular has both refinanced existing debt, and repurchased its own debt on the open market (for a quick explanation of the accounting behind debt repurchases, read <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/03/fas-159-clearing-up-muddled-mortgage.html">Muddled REIT Book Values Create Opportunity</a>).  The ability to delever in this market is obviously <span style="font-style: italic;">muy bueno</span>, even though Brandywine also <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/06/9-reits-that-had-to-be-destroyed-in.html">diluted shareholders to death in the process</a>.</p>
<p>Paolone also thinks <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><span id="ticker">(BDN)</span></span> will pay a special dividend in Q4. Be aware of the fact that JP Morgan was joint lead underwriter on BDN&#8217;s very dilutive equity offering, so do look carefully beneath the hood before plunging in.</p>
<p><center><object height="303" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/2/&amp;csEnv=p&amp;wpid=0&amp;va_id=1009814"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/06/9-reits-that-had-to-be-destroyed-in.html"><embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/2/&amp;csEnv=p&amp;wpid=0&amp;va_id=1009814" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="303" width="320"></embed></a></object></center></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Enjoy the vid!</div>
<p><img title="REIT Invesments" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT Investments" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">office REITs</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments">reit investments</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks">reit stocks</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate">commercial real estate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/07/jp-morgan-likes-reit-brandywine-bdn-and.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maguire (MPG) Sells Orange County Property at 40% Discount to Cost</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/06/maguire-sells-orange-county-property-at.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/06/maguire-sells-orange-county-property-at.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maguire Properties (MPG), the Office REIT that bought 24 office properties and 11 development sites from Blackstone for $2.88 billion at the height of the market, just got a market read on its Orange County holdings. According to the Wall Street Journal, Emmes Holdings in New York recently agreed to buy MPG&#8217;s stake in a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify">Maguire Properties (<span style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,255)"><span id="ticker">MPG</span></span>), the Office REIT that bought 24 office properties and 11 development sites from Blackstone for $2.88 billion at the height of the market, just got a market read on its Orange County holdings. According to the Wall Street Journal, Emmes Holdings in New York recently agreed to buy MPG&#8217;s stake in a newly constructed office property in Irvine, Calif., for about $160 million, representing a 40% discount to its construction cost.</p>
<p>Maguire&#8217;s heavy concentration in Orange County gives it exposure to the subprime debacle that probably rivals AIG, given that Orange County was subprime central HQ for many mortgage lenders. This exposure is resulting in an epic struggle to dig out from under the debt incurred in that 2007 purchase. Making matters even worse, the FDIC&#8217;s grim reapers are out in full force in Orange County, shuttering bank offices and rejecting leases without the customary remedies afforded to landlords under Chapter 11.</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer <span style="font-size:78%;">but I live in San Francisco and like to play dress up every now and then</span> and Federal bankruptcy laws are complex, but in general, Chapter 11 default remedies for owner/lessors of commercial real estate typically allow 60 days for bankrupt lessees to affirm or reject their leases. For those leases that are rejected, the properties are thrown back on the market in search of a new lessee, and the owner/lessor receives an unsecured claim <span style="font-size:78%;">get in line, buddy</span> limited to three year&#8217;s worth of rent.</p>
<p>However, The FDIC&#8217;s authority to reject leases does not fall under Chapter 11 of the Code, and it is even more draconian. If a lease is rejected by the FDIC as receiver, the owner is simply handed the keys <span style="font-size:78%;">imminent default</span> and the contract is extinguished &#8211; with absolutely no claim on the estate of the dearly departed. This obviously makes it tough to pay your friendly banker on the first of every month.</p>
<p>This is exactly what has happened with Quintana, an office property jointly owned by Maguire (20%) and Maquarie Office Trust (80% &#8211; ASX: MOF). Maguire announced today that the FDIC has rejected the majority of WAMUs lease at Quintana, which is also in Orange County. According to the press release, the FDIC <span style="font-size:78%;">surprise!</span> is &#8220;not obligated to pay any rent or other compensation in connection with the lease termination&#8221;.</p>
<p>This brings the occupancy of Quintana to approximately 40%, which is unsustainable in relation to the debt (a now completely underwater $106 million CMBS loan maturing in December 2011). Maguire has commenced discussions with the special servicer, and a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure deal is the most likely outcome. This will probably wipe out all of MGP&#8217;s equity in the property.</p>
<p>With respect to the sale of the aforementioned newly-constructed property to the Emmes Group, it&#8217;s noteworthy that financing was provided by EuroHypo, itself a struggling lender. But don&#8217;t get your hopes up &#8211; the loan was not new money. EuroHypo simply allowed Emmes to assume the original construction loan in return for injecting fresh equity.</p>
<p>Until Emmes showed up with its $160 million check, EuroHypo was in about as much distress on this deal as MPG. Last month, Maguire took a $23.5 million first-quarter noncash impairment charge on the property, following a $50 million noncash impairment charge on the same property in prior quarter. EuroHypo&#8217;s $165 million construction loan was set to mature in September 2009, but it will now live on (with principal reduced) as term financing for a brand new borrower. And the beat goes on!</p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img title="REIT Investments" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="REIT Investments" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate">commercial real estate</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments">reit investments</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">office reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks">reit stocks</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+news" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+news">reit news</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/06/maguire-sells-orange-county-property-at.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Real Estate Loan Originations Show Continued Deterioration in CRE</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-loan.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-loan.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment REIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial reits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mortgage Bankers Association has released their quarterly survey of commercial/multi-family loan originations, and it shows continued dramatic deterioration in all CRE lending sectors, including an 80% plunge in bank lending. Earlier this week, I wrote that commercial real estate transaction volume had declined to practically zero, so it&#8217;s no surprise that loan originations would [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify">The Mortgage Bankers Association has released their quarterly survey of commercial/multi-family loan originations, and it shows continued dramatic deterioration in all CRE lending sectors, including an 80% plunge in bank lending.</p>
<p><p>
Earlier this week, I wrote that <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-investors-brace.html">commercial real estate transaction volume</a> had declined to practically zero, so it&#8217;s no surprise that loan originations would show a concurrent decline, but that decline was precipitous:  Q1 loan originations declined to the lowest quarterly level in the 7-year period covered by the survey.  </p>
<p>The report is unclear as to which tail is wagging this dog, however. Is the decline in loan volume the result of &#8220;suicide-tight&#8221; underwriting, or simply a lack of buyers transacting on new deals?  Anecdotally, there is a lot of equity sitting patiently on the sidelines at the moment, so it&#8217;s likely the latter.  In addition to the 80% decline in bank lending, insurance company loan activity declined by 66% and GSE lending dropped by 26%.  It was so bad, I decided to paint a picture.  <span style="font-size:78%;">the things I do for you</span></p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/Q1-Loan-Originations-727807.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 281px;" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/Q1-Loan-Originations-727804.jpg" alt="commercial real estate loan origination volume 2002-2009" border="0" /></a><br />There were some intriguing data in the survey though (read the full report <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com//1Q09CMFOriginationsSurvey.pdf">here</a>).  One interesting finding is that while all loan activity decreased, industrial loan activity this quarter decreased the least vs. the year ago period, even less than multi-family.  In fact, industrial loan activity from Q4 to Q1 actually <span style="font-style:italic;">increased<span style="font-weight:bold;"></span></span> by 67%.  With loan capital still flowing into that sector, well capitalized  industrial REITs are still relatively healthy.  </p>
<p>Indeed, <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/industrial-reit-list.html">industrial REIT yields</a> are among the lowest in the sector.  This should enable industrial REITs to recover more quickly.  Unfortunately, that is small comfort to those who lost their shirts betting on the likes of Pro-Logis (<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><span id="ticker">PLD</span></span>).  It&#8217;s also a sign of hope around increased economic activity, and probably of inflation as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Not surprising is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to be practically the only game town for apartment lending, which declined by 61% in the quarter from one year ago.  Hotel loans were down a whopping 88%, followed by healthcare (down 80%), retail (down 76%) and office lending (down 66%).  Aside from the good news for industrial REITs, the only other obvious silver lining is that the rate of decrease in activity has slowed.  So things aren&#8217;t getting much worse, but it&#8217;s still awfully hard to see anything even remotely shaped like a &#8220;V&#8221; on the horizon.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img title="REIT Invesments" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT Investments" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate">commercial real estate</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate+loans" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate+loans">commercial real estate loans</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments">reit investments</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks">reit stocks</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+news" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+news">reit news</a> </div>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-loan.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Real Estate Investors Brace For Pivotal 4th Quarter</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-investors-brace.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-investors-brace.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commercial mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REIT Stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REIT earnings season got into full swing last week, but there&#8217;s a lot more on investor&#8217;s minds these days that last quarter&#8217;s earnings. Transaction volume has continued to plunge, and CMBS loans placed in special servicing have continued to rise like a poodle in a jetpack. This can mean only one thing, and in the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify"><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/">REIT earnings</a> season got into full swing last week, but there&#8217;s a lot more on investor&#8217;s minds these days that last quarter&#8217;s earnings.  Transaction volume has continued to plunge, and CMBS loans placed in special servicing have continued  to rise <span style="font-size:78%;">like a poodle in a jetpack</span>.</p>
<p>This can mean only one thing, and in the words David Hamamoto, CEO of Northstar Realty Finance (NRF), it is that there is a growing backlog of motivated sellers who &#8220;will begin to transact later this year and who will establish market pricing as deals are completed.&#8221;  That people will need to sell is not in dispute, but exactly what &#8220;market pricing&#8221; will be is the $64,000 question.</p>
<p>Globally, commercial real estate sales plummeted more than 70 percent in the first quarter from the end of 2008, according to Real Capital Analytics.  In the United States, first quarter sales were not only anemic, they may also be a form of karmic justice to CRE brokers who are now fond of saying that distressed buyers simply &#8220;overleveraged&#8221;.  Really?</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/CRE-Transaction-Volume-783375.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 261px;" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/CRE-Transaction-Volume-783373.jpg" alt="commercial real estate sales volume" border="0" /></a><br />Even apartments, which still enjoy the availability of buyer financing from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saw transaction volume fall 62 percent in 2008, and another 86 percent in the first quarter of 2009 alone.  With an average of only 50 apartment sales taking place each month across the entire country, it&#8217;s simply no wonder that pricing is unclear.</p>
<p>What is clear, however, is that prices are dropping.  And as prices drop, &#8220;overleveraged&#8221; buyers, or those who were basically convinced to overpay for their assets, are unable to refinance their loans.  CMBS loans placed in &#8220;special servicing&#8221;, which indicates that the borrower is in some form of distress, were dramatically up and to the right at the end of 2008:</p>
<div  style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;">Loans Placed In Special Servicing<br /><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: normal;font-size:78%;" >(January 2000 through January 2008)</span><br /></span></div>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/Deustche-Bank-Special-Servicing-755352.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 199px;" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/Deustche-Bank-Special-Servicing-755348.jpg" alt="CMBS loans in special servicing" border="0" /></a>
<div  style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:78%;">Source: Deutsche Bank</span></div>
<p>That trend accelerated in the first quarter of 2009.  CMBS loans in special servicing jumped another 48 percent (as measured by outstanding loan balance), according to Fitch.  &#8220;Imminent default&#8221; was cited as the reason for 73 percent of the special-servicing transfers.  Since the end of 2007, the percentage of CMBS loans in special servicing has grown from 0.54 percent to almost 3 percent or outstanding loans.</p>
<p>Nationally, default and delinquency rates for CMBS rose to 1.76%, or $10.7 billion, in the first quarter, up 62 basis points from the previous quarter and more than triple the rate of delinquencies recorded in Q1 2008 (<em>these figures do not include loans associated with the bankruptcy of General Growth Properties</em>).  According to REIS Inc., the CMBS default rate could reach 6% by year’s end.</p>
<p>The lack of transaction volume and the increasing levels of distress perfectly illustrate the current market quandary:  lenders are unwilling to foreclose on properties that cover debt service, albeit barely, and sellers are unwilling to sell properties at what they believe to be artificially low prices driven by unsustainably low availability of debt capital.</p>
<p>This face-off will not last.  Banks must clear their balance sheets at the same time that capitalization rates are rising and NOI is dropping.  Rising cap rates mean that a buyer of an office building at a 6 cap in a strong market like Washington D.C. is staring at a 30% decline in value, peak to trough, assuming NOI has remained the same (which is almost certainly not the case).  Buyers in tertiary markets are in even worse shape.</p>
<p>However, just as the excess of ready and available credit led to unsustainably high asset values in 2005-2007, so will the dearth of ready and available credit lead to unsustainably low asset values in 2010.  Not surprisingly, some investors smell opportunity, and they are betting with real money.  Publicly traded REITs raised $10.6 billion in equity in the first quarter, including $6.51 billion in April alone.  This is a tidal wave of cash, and the Bloomberg REIT stock index rose by 30%.  Nobody ever rings a bell at the bottom of a market, and $10.6 billion says why bother to listen for it now?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img title="REIT Invesments" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT Investments" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/commercial+real+estate">commercial real estate</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+investments">reit investments</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+stocks">reit stocks</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+news" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit+news">reit news</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/05/commercial-real-estate-investors-brace.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Northstar Going Non-Traded REIT Route</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/03/northstar-going-non-traded-reit-route.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/03/northstar-going-non-traded-reit-route.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Non-Traded REIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Traded REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just two weeks ago, I speculated about REIT capital shortages and the ability of non-traded REIT equity to fill the gap in the post Averting Massive Sector Wide REIT Defaults: Non-Traded Equity May Be Part of the Answer. Pacific Office Properties Trust (PCE) had just disclosed their intention to raise $350 million through this market, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify">Just two weeks ago, I speculated about REIT capital shortages and the ability of non-traded REIT equity to fill the gap in the post <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/02/averting-massive-sector-wide-reit.html"><em>Averting Massive Sector Wide REIT Defaults:  Non-Traded Equity May Be Part of the Answer</em></a>.  </p>
<p>Pacific Office Properties Trust (PCE) had just disclosed their intention to raise $350 million through this market, and now NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (NRF) is following suit with intentions to raise up to $1.1 billion in non-traded REIT equity.  Whether NRF actually intends to raise this much in this market is uncertain.  Offering $1.1 billion in non-traded REIT equity would be an absolutely huge undertaking, as it represents more than 10% of the market&#8217;s entire 2008 initial offering volume.</p>
<p>NRF remains one of my favorite <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/mortgage-reit-list.html">Mortgage REITs</a>, but the market has been just as unkind to NRF as it has to most other <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/03/reit-stocks-4-ways-to-play-carnage.html">REIT stocks</a>.  The stock is down almost 70% since NRF&#8217;s chairman David Hammamoto bought a bunch of stock on the open market at $8.26/share only months ago.  Management owns a significant amount of stock, so it&#8217;s no wonder they are pursuing cost-effective ways to recapitalize their balance sheet.   </p>
<p>NRF and PCE are two of the only publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trusts to tap this market, but they are only the latest in a growing list of entities accessing this market. But do yourself a favor and don&#8217;t even think of <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/05/non-traded-reits-are-designed-to-be.html">buying a non-traded REIT</a>.  In just the first three months of the year, five companies have launched efforts to raise $7.2 billion of equity through non-traded REITs.  By comparison, $9.6 billion of equity was raised in this market in all of 2008.</p>
<p>For Northstar, a non-traded REIT offering is an incredibly cheap source of equity capital.  NRF intends to raise the equity through a new entity, so existing shareholders in NRF common will not be diluted.  The new NRF non-traded REIT intends to pay its investors an annual <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/02/reit-dividends-crumbling-with.html">REIT dividend</a> of 8 percent, which would be higher than the 5-7 percent typically paid by non-traded REITs and far better terms on equity than what NRF could get elsewhere.</p>
<p>While the offering is undoubtedly very attractive to NRF with respect to the scant alternatives available, it remains to be seen how well shareholders in the new entity will fare.  Investors will pay fees of as much as 7 percent to cover the cost of selling commissions; a 3 percent dealer-manager fee, and 3 percent to cover the costs of organizing the entity.  Accordingly, only 87 percent of every dollar raised will actually go toward investing in mortgages.</p>
<p>NorthStar&#8217;s aim is to execute what it termed a &#8220;liquidity transaction&#8221; within five years of raising the capital. That could be a sale of assets, merger or listing on a stock exchange.  Historical non-traded REIT returns are hard to quantify, because so few have executed their so-called liquidity events.  Given how cheap this capital is, it&#8217;s no wonder.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT Investments" title="REIT Investments" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Disclosures: Long NRF at the time of publication<br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mortgage+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/mortgage+reits">mortgage reits</a><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">office reits</a>,<br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit">reit</a>,</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/03/northstar-going-non-traded-reit-route.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REIT Outlook: 5% More Downside in 2009</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/02/reit-outlook-5-more-downside-in-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/02/reit-outlook-5-more-downside-in-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now the REIT story is a familiar one. They face a weakening economy, decreasing rents, lower occupancy, great difficulty refinancing old debt and even more difficulty raising new capital of almost any sort. The JP Morgan analyst in this video interview sees at least 5% more downside from here. However, he does like at [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify">By now the REIT story is a familiar one.  They face a weakening economy, decreasing rents, lower occupancy, great difficulty refinancing old debt and even more difficulty raising new capital of almost any sort.  The JP Morgan analyst in this video interview sees at least 5% more downside from here.</p>
<p>However, he does like at least one REIT: Boston Properties (BXP).  Boston Properties is primarily an office REIT (see the <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/office-reit-list.html">office REIT list</a> for a list of office REITs, including current yields).  The analyst likes BXP Management and believes they have the highest quality portfolio in the group.  If the video below does not load, you can <a href="http://www.clipsyndicate.com/publish/video/830598/sector_focus_reits">view it here</a>.</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="303"><param name="movie" value="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/2/&amp;va_id=830598&amp;wpid=0&amp;csEnv="><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><embed src="http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/get_swf/2/&amp;va_id=830598&amp;wpid=0&amp;csEnv=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="303"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/office-reit-list.html">list of Office REITs</a>, including current yields</p>
<p>Click here for a <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/02/reits-paying-dividends-in-stock.html">list of REITs paying dividends in stock</a></p>
<p>Information on how REITs work can be found in the post <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/08/reit-definition.html">REIT Definition</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT Dividends" title="REIT Dividends" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Disclosures: None at the time of publication<br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">apartment reits</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit">reit</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/02/reit-outlook-5-more-downside-in-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston&#8217;s Hancock Tower Goes Into Default</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/01/bostons-hancock-tower-goes-into-default.html</link>
		<comments>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/01/bostons-hancock-tower-goes-into-default.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REIT Wrecks]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Office REITs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reitwrecks.com/wordpress/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Broadway Partners, the heavily indebted private equity firm that purchased Boston’s landmark Hancock Tower at the top of the market in 2006 defaulted on a key loan payment last week. The iconic office building is a trophy property in the heart of Boston&#8217;s Back Bay district. The real estate fund manager purchased the property for [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div align="justify">Broadway Partners, the heavily indebted private equity firm that purchased Boston’s landmark Hancock Tower at the top of the market in 2006 defaulted on a key loan payment last week. The iconic office building is a trophy property in the heart of Boston&#8217;s Back Bay district. The real estate fund manager purchased the property for $1.3 billion from Beacon Capital Partners, but the office tower now appears to be headed toward foreclosure.</p>
<p>Defunct Lehman Brothers, described a few months ago by the New York Times as a &#8220;real estate ATM&#8221; arranged a $472 million mezzanine loan to help fund the acquisition, behind Royal Bank of Scotland&#8217;s first mortgage in the amount of $640 million. The RBS loan was arranged by its real estate affiliate, Greenwich Capital Markets. The Boston Globe reported earlier that the property was worth no more than $1 billion, according a local real estate executive with access to the numbers.</p>
<p>Of course, the Lehman and RBS loans were both short-term variable rate deals based on &#8220;pro-forma rent&#8221; and occupancy levels. With the tower about to report a 15% vacancy rate this month, it&#8217;s unlikely that it came even close to meeting the original rent growth assumptions in the pro forma, and rents are likely to keep going down, not up.</p>
<p>The building is the tallest tower in New England and also features a 2,000 stall parking garage. Betwen 2002 and 2007, Broadway Partners spent more than $13 billion buying up trophy office towers across the country, including large trophy assets in New York and San Francisco.</p>
<p>The firm&#8217;s founder got his start <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/auction-gavel-784204.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right; width: 113px; height: 105px;" alt="" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/auction-gavel-784202.jpg" border="0" /></a>in 2000, with the purchase of an old school building in Hartsdale, New York for less than $5 million, which is basically the real estate equivalent  of <a href="http://www.howtobuypennystocks.com/">buying penny stocks</a>. But his luck has now run out, and he and his firm are racing to sell whatever assets they can while they still can. The firm&#8217;s deal to sell a San Francisco office tower has been stalled since May of 2008, and it now looks unlikely to close at all unless accompanied by the sound of a gavel.</p>
<p>According to the Boston Herald, Broadway Partners issued a statement yesterday in an attempt to calm the nerves of its institutional investors, all of whom look increasingly likely to take a big haircut on the relationship:</p>
<p>“Despite difficult market conditions, we continue to work hard with our lenders and partners to address debt obligations,” the statement read. “In the meantime, Broadway Partners continues to operate great buildings with high service standards.”</p>
<p>Under the terms of Broadway’s mortgage, a default gives Greenwich the right to potentially sell the Hancock Tower, auction it off or take over the building’s management and rental income.  Given the rapidly weakening economy, neither option is likely to result in full recovery.  For a more background on why, click on the post relating to <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/12/economics-of-coming-commercial-real.html">commercial real estate values</a> in this market.  As a consequence of those economics and the bloodletting that needs to occur, Moody&#8217;s sees no <a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/2008/12/commercial-real-esate-to-bottom-in-2010.html">bottom in commercial real estate until 2010</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reitwrecks.com/"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="REIT list" title="REIT list" src="http://www.reitwrecks.com/uploaded_images/signoff50px-788584.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/office+reits">office reits</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reits" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reits">reits</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/reit" rel="tag" xhref="http://technorati.com/tag/reit">reit</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gdmig-reitwrecks.com/2009/01/bostons-hancock-tower-goes-into-default.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
